<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Just a question from the polls</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jmday.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=115" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jmday.com/?p=115&#038;utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=just-a-question-from-the-polls</link>
	<description>I&#039;m not a geek, but I play one in real life</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Apr 2017 13:16:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.40</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amy</title>
		<link>http://jmday.com/?p=115&#038;cpage=1#comment-261</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Amy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 15:13:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jmday.com/?p=115#comment-261</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As a security person: What Gopi said, particularly the Schneier article. If you don&#039;t feel like reading the article, the lack of any kind of audit trail is generally regarded to be the biggest (but not only) issue.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a security person: What Gopi said, particularly the Schneier article. If you don&#8217;t feel like reading the article, the lack of any kind of audit trail is generally regarded to be the biggest (but not only) issue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gopi</title>
		<link>http://jmday.com/?p=115&#038;cpage=1#comment-259</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gopi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Mar 2008 05:57:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jmday.com/?p=115#comment-259</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Paper is more secure, and leaves a trail that can be used to verify/recount.

Security expert Bruce Schneier has a nice essay explaining the issue:

http://www.schneier.com/essay-039.html]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paper is more secure, and leaves a trail that can be used to verify/recount.</p>
<p>Security expert Bruce Schneier has a nice essay explaining the issue:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.schneier.com/essay-039.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.schneier.com/essay-039.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: marlena</title>
		<link>http://jmday.com/?p=115&#038;cpage=1#comment-257</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[marlena]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 23:45:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jmday.com/?p=115#comment-257</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[i live in oregon and the thing that i LIKE about voting with write in ballots (paper you send in the mail) is that i don&#039;t have to go out of my way to wait in line to vote. With a rowdy 3 year old, it&#039;s not very convenient. but what sucks about it is that they screw up so easily. for example, during the last presidential election, i had gotten married a few months before election day. i had changed my name and done all the right legal stuff i needed to do on my end. well lo and behold, they sent me a ballot for both my maiden AND my married name! i didn&#039;t want them to throw out both my ballots when they realized i had voted with both my names and i had to go to the voter registration and straighten it out. annoying!
but what you mention is definitely a concern of mine. i guess you&#039;re damned if you do, damned if you don&#039;t , know what i mean?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i live in oregon and the thing that i LIKE about voting with write in ballots (paper you send in the mail) is that i don&#8217;t have to go out of my way to wait in line to vote. With a rowdy 3 year old, it&#8217;s not very convenient. but what sucks about it is that they screw up so easily. for example, during the last presidential election, i had gotten married a few months before election day. i had changed my name and done all the right legal stuff i needed to do on my end. well lo and behold, they sent me a ballot for both my maiden AND my married name! i didn&#8217;t want them to throw out both my ballots when they realized i had voted with both my names and i had to go to the voter registration and straighten it out. annoying!<br />
but what you mention is definitely a concern of mine. i guess you&#8217;re damned if you do, damned if you don&#8217;t , know what i mean?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: drew</title>
		<link>http://jmday.com/?p=115&#038;cpage=1#comment-256</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[drew]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 22:50:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jmday.com/?p=115#comment-256</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think they should go old school style and make everyone bring their Number 2 Pencil with them to vote. But better yet, make sure it&#039;s clear of who they&#039;re voting for without the punch out holes and maybe make it permanent ink so they can&#039;t easily erase it. Then you&#039;re the one who feeds it into the counting machine with results printed out for you for proof. 

There&#039;s really no fool proof way to vote in my opinion. Anything can be tampered with.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think they should go old school style and make everyone bring their Number 2 Pencil with them to vote. But better yet, make sure it&#8217;s clear of who they&#8217;re voting for without the punch out holes and maybe make it permanent ink so they can&#8217;t easily erase it. Then you&#8217;re the one who feeds it into the counting machine with results printed out for you for proof. </p>
<p>There&#8217;s really no fool proof way to vote in my opinion. Anything can be tampered with.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
